CRW2602 Criminal Law: Specific Crimes (CRW2602)

the document has the latest questions and elaborate answers

CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2023

CRW2602 CRIMINAL LAW EXAM PACK.Question 1 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi). (b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient form of intention. (c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6. You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statements (a) and (c) are correct. Question 2 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. (b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. (c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. You sh...

Multiple chioce Question 1 (a) If X hires Z to murder Y and Z murders Y, Z is the indirect perpetrator. (b) If X buys dagga for his own use and Y acts merely as interpreter to the transaction, Y can qualify as an accomplice. (c) In Thebus 2003 (2) SACR 319 (CC) it was held that the only way in which a common purpose can be established is if there is proof of a prior agreement between two or more participants. (1) Only statement (a) is correct. (2) Only statement (b) is correct. (3) Onl...

questions with well outlined answers for exam preparations. compiled from past years

CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes Assignment 1 Semester 2 2022. The Successful Swallows, a popular South African soccer team, is facing their rivals, the Chanting Chiefs, also a popular South African soccer team, in the finals of the Golden Cup Championships. Thousands of tickets went on sale for this exciting event, but the tickets were sold out before many soccer enthusiasts could obtain tickets for the event. On the day of the match, three thousand Successful Swallows supporters,...

CRW2602 EXAM PACK. This is a com0lete and an all-inclusive guide to CRW2602 Criminal Law: Specific Crimes.

CRW2602 CRIMINAL LAW EXAM PACK. This is a complete and an all-inclusive guide to CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes.

CRW2602-Criminal Law: Specific Crimes MCQ EXAM PACK 2020. assignment 2020 QUESTION 1 (a) In the crime of crimen iniuria the infringement need not be serious as a minor infringement of the legally-protected interests is deemed sufficient. This statement is incorrect. The infringement must be serious in the case of the crime of crimen iniuria. See SG 7.2.8. (b) In S v Van Leperen 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC), X was convicted of crimen iniuria for slapping Y, a female manager, on the buttocks an...

CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes EXAM PACK 1. PART A (MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS) Question 1 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi). (b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient form of intention. (c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6. You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statements (a) and (c) are correct. Question 2 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. (b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4...